treeve
Major Contributor
Many people are now complaining of illnesses and discomforts following a spray.
Aerosol components may not be simply sulphurous; interestingly The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does not consider the action of sulphurous aerosol is as yet fully understood. This from a group that advocates the premise that man is contributing to the Carbon Dioxide component is going to approach critical and that something must be done about it.
OK take a spray, the component particles after spreading to form the blanket that reflects the sun's rays and keeps the heat in, is dispersed down into the troposphere, where it is gathered by winds, currents, absorbed into the clouds and water vapour, eventually ending up as rain or simply falling detritus that can be inhaled or is absorbed into the ground and into plants, even absorbed by skin and into the folds of the eyes. Those particles will be falling 20km, in what direction depends upon the air into which it falls, or for that matter the jet stream. The gravitational straight down would not happen. Whatever falls knows no geographical limitation.
I have reservations about claims of illness and discomfort during and following a spray. However, if the spray was taken over a period of days, then some overspill from adjoining skies will have a cumulative effect.
As well as that, there would be a cumulative effect in natures great reservoir for materials that should not be there, the soil. Add to this the expectation of intended operations and of the observance of widespread operations and it has to be accepted that this has been continuing for some 14 years.
Michael Murphy says on Countercurrents.org [2010]
Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-engineering (SAG)
Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future” aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.
I find that to be extremely disturbing.
Aerosol components may not be simply sulphurous; interestingly The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does not consider the action of sulphurous aerosol is as yet fully understood. This from a group that advocates the premise that man is contributing to the Carbon Dioxide component is going to approach critical and that something must be done about it.
OK take a spray, the component particles after spreading to form the blanket that reflects the sun's rays and keeps the heat in, is dispersed down into the troposphere, where it is gathered by winds, currents, absorbed into the clouds and water vapour, eventually ending up as rain or simply falling detritus that can be inhaled or is absorbed into the ground and into plants, even absorbed by skin and into the folds of the eyes. Those particles will be falling 20km, in what direction depends upon the air into which it falls, or for that matter the jet stream. The gravitational straight down would not happen. Whatever falls knows no geographical limitation.
I have reservations about claims of illness and discomfort during and following a spray. However, if the spray was taken over a period of days, then some overspill from adjoining skies will have a cumulative effect.
As well as that, there would be a cumulative effect in natures great reservoir for materials that should not be there, the soil. Add to this the expectation of intended operations and of the observance of widespread operations and it has to be accepted that this has been continuing for some 14 years.
Michael Murphy says on Countercurrents.org [2010]
Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-engineering (SAG)
Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are considering implementing in the various potential “future” aerosol spraying campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.
I find that to be extremely disturbing.
. I am dismissing levels of pollution as to claims of poisoning the environment. The idea that particles descend vertically (unlike the WTC) is a nonsense. Having seen the extent of scientific research undertaken over many years by those whose ideals are ones of a responsible view of the environment, despite claims of secrecy, it is open and freely available, I cannot accept that it is anything other than an attempt at geoengineering, with flawed thinking.
